ref-manual/qa-checks: remove patch-status-core/patch-status-noncore

These QA checks were merged as "patch-status" after commit
61a881fdbe8b5a21c6276b8a5d06cc30486b1eb3 ("insane: Improve patch-status
layer filtering") in OE-Core.

[ YOCTO #15345 ]

Reported-By: Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@arm.com>
(From yocto-docs rev: 4f18055f796d43e7e6901da0ee9537a165bdf2a5)

Signed-off-by: Antonin Godard <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3f3a9f53fea6c7d533b9e999dc959dcc3bed7745)
Signed-off-by: Antonin Godard <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antonin Godard
2024-12-24 11:41:20 +01:00
committed by Steve Sakoman
parent 08b9ccdba3
commit 466e5def1b

View File

@@ -752,21 +752,17 @@ Errors and Warnings
.. _qa-check-patch-status:
- ``Missing Upstream-Status in patch <patchfile> Please add according to <url> [patch-status-core/patch-status-noncore]``
- ``Missing Upstream-Status in patch <patchfile> Please add according to <url> [patch-status]``
The ``Upstream-Status`` value is missing in the specified patch file's header.
This value is intended to track whether or not the patch has been sent
upstream, whether or not it has been merged, etc.
There are two options for this same check - ``patch-status-core`` (for
recipes in OE-Core) and ``patch-status-noncore`` (for recipes in any other
layer).
For more information, see the
":ref:`contributor-guide/recipe-style-guide:patch upstream status`"
section in the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded Contributor Guide.
- ``Malformed Upstream-Status in patch <patchfile> Please correct according to <url> [patch-status-core/patch-status-noncore]``
- ``Malformed Upstream-Status in patch <patchfile> Please correct according to <url> [patch-status]``
The ``Upstream-Status`` value in the specified patch file's header is invalid -
it must be a specific format. See the "Missing Upstream-Status" entry above