python3: make gdbm optional

The use case is building a gpl3-free image, without having
to rely on outdated recipes from meta-gplv2 layer.

(From OE-Core rev: 033a63507d1ccd423b8023575729ff089614303b)

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Kanavin
2020-06-24 23:13:25 +03:00
committed by Richard Purdie
parent 9771da0a54
commit eeef7b053f
3 changed files with 46 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
From e3b59cb9658e1d3efa3535840939a0fa92a70a5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:22:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] setup.py: do not report missing dependencies for disabled
modules
Reporting those missing dependencies is misleading as the modules would not
have been built anyway. This particularly matters in oe-core's automated
build completeness checker which relies on the report.
Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe-core specific]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
---
setup.py | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
index 4b53668..0097643 100644
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -365,6 +365,10 @@ class PyBuildExt(build_ext):
print("%-*s %-*s %-*s" % (longest, e, longest, f,
longest, g))
+ # There is no need to report missing module dependencies,
+ # if the modules have been disabled in the first place.
+ missing = list(set(missing) - set(sysconf_dis))
+
if missing:
print()
print("Python build finished successfully!")

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
From 6229502e5ae6cbb22240594f002638e9ef78f831 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From a274ba778838824efcacaba57c415b7262f779ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:00:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] python3: Add target and native recipes