Took care of some quoting for the "x11" feature and also a
messed up sentence in the second paragraph.
(From yocto-docs rev: ed71135edbdd8de02cbb6d7cc972aab0e269e4cb)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I noticed that chapter 10 of the ref-manual still had
"Reference: Features" as the title. This is left over from way
back. I changed that chapter title to "Features." Next, I
noticed an inconsistency with some sub-section titles.
I changed the "Images" title into "Image Features." This affected
several links across the doc set so I had to update those
cross-references as well so they have the latest section title
as part of the reference.
(From yocto-docs rev: b68f009a92e0e24802e367d98cf66e15ba1cd364)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In the "Dependency Graphs" section, the pn-buildlist file was
not mentioned as a file generated by the
'bitbake -g <target>' command. I added this in and provided a
bit of re-writing.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 435de6a980bd182e8033319e479ded1414e93eed)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This term should always reference a users current working directory
and not be confused with the OpenEmbedded build system's "work
directory (WORKDIR). I found several instances where the term
"working directory" was not used correctly and fixed them.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 300c78c1d54b2a4fbb8ecca03faa7c8c67bdc54f)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I updated the MACHINE_FEATURES, DISTRO_FEATURES, and
COMBINED_FEATURES variable descriptions to better reflect what
they actually do. Also, fixed two occurences of IrDA in the
features lists section.
(From yocto-docs rev: af79b0b3bc88ca0811d488c7c5d6b5407de808a7)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Very rough draft for this new variable. It will likely
change.
(From yocto-docs rev: b535542975ae469753cb27ce59f9f716167384fb)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The operator used was "=" which was inconsistent in light of
previous uses of the variable in the ptest section. I changed the
operator to "+=" to be consistent.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: d6b7c7e15290e64f4baac25544224788e92ad309)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After adding "Package Group" definition as the original "Task"
definition, we needed to create a new definition for the term
"Task".
(From yocto-docs rev: b6eae9242bf488d3f086e496b52d8422ad31feb6)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Removed the note indicating that three specific recipes were
"ptest-enabled" for the release. I substituted in wording that
tells the user to see if a a recipe inherits ptest as a way
of determining if the receipe is ptest-enabled.
(From yocto-docs rev: 9136617575eb7a0a08f0b81f75ae6cdede62219f)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The image core-image-gtk-directfb really should be
core-image-directfb. Also, we need to add the core-image-weston
image to the list of images chapter.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 66625cc8da339d3096edbc8623ca4b91b4bb6858)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Changed the wording so that it reflects better what is actually
going on when use IMAGE_INSTALL to afect an image.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 243588460fb76a0c333772e3dce566cf664397ee)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I added glossary definitions for BUGTRACKER and
CLASSOVERRIDE.
(From yocto-docs rev: 79c10f1cf0f18429eb41b035ed60264b48549e9a)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY variable seems to be able
to be set using "1", "yes", and "true". And, it is set using
these various methods throughout the poky metadata. I guess it
has caused a bit of confusion so I have added the fact to the
description.
Reporte-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 651e09aba67f9d62ce005529f16a776c0ab593f1)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If someone wants to check this over, make sure I didn't make
any silly changes.
(From yocto-docs rev: 3305553d84fbd09fb00d4608533f830348fda0cc)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Given the length of the tools sections in the profiling manual,
I'm doing each tool separately so that patches come in
manageable chunks.
(From yocto-docs rev: f6544c8df852f83619d942b3a6f624fc62981a40)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
given the length of chapter 5 in the dev manual, i'm going to do
this in bite-size pieces.
(From yocto-docs rev: ccfe3e719bf71236e50b3e4507a6d63199f24ff5)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* is it technically correct to say there are now 5 BSPs? as in, does
genericx86-64 count as a new BSP distinct from genericx86? [aside: are
there any plans for a MIPS64 BSP?] - rpjday
MIPS64 is under development. - scottrif
* if scott is up for it, a couple more variables for the variable
glossary might be BASE_WORKDIR and TARGET_VENDOR, which i would have
added to that variable list but they don't appear in the glossary
- rpjday
Noted. - scottrif
(From yocto-docs rev: fae6f8baebedaa72f5e37b4f1a39a9accf9b196c)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
scott (or anyone else) is welcome to use any or all of this, or
tweak to taste. i have a few other concerns with ch 2 but i'll read it
more carefully to make sure i'm reading it correctly. - rpjday
I implemented all but the addition of MIPS64 as it is not tested
using the autobuilder yet. - scottrif
(From yocto-docs rev: 927ff9be66a7471a33faf18a1122ce8b2bd21805)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The examples went stale. Two out of three did not work. I have
provided new examples that work.
Reporte-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: 0a3695f3f6a5b31617f4a5da960677f87733b825)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Changed wording to remove implications of meta-intel clone
importance regarding working with BSPs.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: e5f80aadf6f651af6efae6e99d0a4d9b6e76fc99)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't even support these Linux distributions. We should not
have a FAQ entry telling people how to deal with it. If the
distro is that "hot", we should take steps to support it.
(From yocto-docs rev: b2f77f048da82becb590f948c41e94598817b4ee)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I re-wrote this FAQ entry to indicate more recent versions of
Python and to leverage off the way we can now download or build
out the buildtools.
Reported-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
(From yocto-docs rev: a4743936fa6dcd9449f0def771d116c53db7aa7e)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There was inconsistent use of the way directory names were
handled throughout the YP documentation. I have scrubbed the
set and replaced many instances such as the following:
meta/<something> replaces /meta/<something>
poky replaces ~/poky (except in some very specific examples)
I basically got rid of leading slash characters.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: ae2e451ed8f61484d04b30017021912c4493a441)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Significant tweaks:
* removal of (confusing) leading slashes from YP filenames
* deletion of reference to non-existent "build/tmp/pkgdata/"
(From yocto-docs rev: c105ae9c6741fbe195addf52d313925bab50ba40)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I altered three areas from the previous patch submitted and
applied from Robert P. J. Day. Two minor wording changes and
removal of negative language.
(From yocto-docs rev: 0212b01f82637c3498f26bce57e98508c84799c5)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Robert P. J. Day noted that the bitbake command no longer uses
a wrapper as the section indicated. I have removed this reference.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: a523d4d4fc57edabfa4aa7d20e154cdc43d35fca)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There was some confusion over some things in these two sections.
I re-wrote them with the help of Paul Eggleton to be clear on
them.
Reported-by: Robert P. J. Day (rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
(From yocto-docs rev: ab352523e82626d8356d8b2c07fb10d2d60ea254)
Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
