Update the runqemu script to allow the user to specify a device tree
to boot when calling runqemu.
This involves creating a seperate check_dtb() function incase the user
has specified 'none' for the kernel but still wants a device tree.
(From OE-Core rev: 867ac1370b294bfd1ee31f94abb63688f77081a1)
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
Cc: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Removed the -m option since this script now searches through all
recipes in the configuration. Also removed dead code, which includes
the functions recipe_bbvars() and collect_bbvars().
(From OE-Core rev: dac6515fcd23ea9cde5308c1d08a7a928efbb4d6)
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Similarly to handling "../", handle "." to resovle to the qemuconf
file's current directory.
(From OE-Core rev: 33418ed064fe9cff5b4803f09135a81d9170c189)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a variable starts with "../", its likely its a path and we want to
set it to an absolute path relative to the qemuconf file.
This means we don't have to use bitbake as often to figure out variables.
(From OE-Core rev: dfc7940900d798aa47716288338107e1d46a3972)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The regexp in the script misses some tap devices, e.g. we see output like:
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap25.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap26.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap27.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap28.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap40.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap41.lock failed: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
What happened to tap29 to tap39?
The issue is was we were missing devices with '0' in the number,
like "10:" and so on in the output from "ip link".
(From OE-Core rev: 6447697a48e3b693ee38806bc2ba07c2a65c2bc8)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a recipe that uses overrides to conditionally extend
SRC_URI to add additional patches, then you will often need to update
those patches if you're making other changes to the source tree (for
example if you're upgrading the underlying source). Make this possible
with devtool by creating devtool-override-* branches for each override
that conditionally appends/prepends SRC_URI, and have devtool
update-recipe / finish check each branch out in turn and update the
corresponding patches.
A current example of a recipe that does this is the quota recipe - it
applies an additional patch if musl is the selected C library (i.e.
libc-musl is in OVERRIDES).
Note that use of this functionality does require some care - in
particular, updates to patches that appear on the main branch (named
"devtool" by default) should be made there and not only on one of the
specific devtool-override-* branches that are created for each override.
The recommended procedure is to make the changes you want to make to the
main branch first, then check out and rebase each devtool-override-*
branch, testing each one by activating the corresponding configuration,
and then finally run devtool finish.
Fixes [YOCTO #11516].
(From OE-Core rev: aa87603d1ffd695027847f4df75c0406cf4e14d8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're not sure what changes devtool finish is going to make, or
you're not sure you're finished with your modifications, it is useful to
be able to see what devtool finish is going to do beforehand, so add
a -N/--dry-run option to make that possible.
(It's also very useful for debugging devtool finish itself.)
(From OE-Core rev: 05f2d5d2ce00c53825ccea5cd9c2262f9d27a638)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a file is going to be effectively removed from the destination by
devtool finish, we should report that rather than just reporting that
we're removing files from the workspace. This is a little tricky because
the way we actually operate when finishing is to:
(1) remove all original files (as recorded by devtool upgrade, if that
was used)
(2) as part of updating the recipe file, remove the files from next to
the new recipe (i.e. in the workspace for an upgrade, real recipe
otherwise) corresponding to commits not in the git tree
(3) copy over remaining files from the workspace to the destination
To report the files removed with respect to what was originally there,
we need to swap steps 1 and 2 so we can see what no longer exists after
the deletion, and suppress the reporting currently done in step 2 -
however, we still want to report removal in step 2 for the non-upgrade
case, so the latter is conditional.
(From OE-Core rev: db1d663507509cac9d97d7c96ac8590478767ba2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the files that the devtool-source class is supposed to create in the
source tree aren't found in the temporary directory then we know that
the class hasn't worked properly - say that explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: 4621152509c037532b133e5e6d5b73bda7ddb602)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Only log one warning message instead of one per line
* Be a bit more verbose
* "if list" is more pythonic than "if len(list)"
(From OE-Core rev: 2d11e9e6e73648c1cb514c0c10111c7886acae78)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the directory where the source code extracts to changes (for
example, when upgrading iucode-tool from 1.5 to 2.1.1, the subdirectory
in the tarball changed from "iucode_tool-${PV}" to "iucode-tool-${PV}")
then handle this automatically. Also handle when it changes to match the
default S value (i.e. "${WORKDIR}/${BP}") in which case we just drop
setting S in the recipe.
Fixes [YOCTO #10939].
(From OE-Core rev: d29881a652bf03627d257a1eac5f02ec17315b8b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I noticed that using bitbake-layers add-layer followed by a devtool
command resulted in bitbake re-parsing all of the recipes, which is
annoying. Upon closer inspection I could see that devtool was moving the
workspace layer path to the end of BBLAYERS if it happened to be
somewhere in the middle - there's no need for it to be doing this. This
occurred because we were passing the current workspace path to remove
and the "new" path to add even if the path is not being changed, and I
think earlier versions of bb.utils.edit_bblayers_conf() didn't move the
existing entry under these circumstances as it clearly does now. Fix it
so we only pass the path to be removed if we're actually changing the
path.
(From OE-Core rev: 284426dbad91a3c52eaf7da5c58fe8a2c2dfb826)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool upgrade did not properly handle setting SRC_URI checksums for
recipes that use named SRC_URI entries and also use those names in the
SRC_URI checksums. A further complication was where the name contained
an expression that changed with the version e.g. ${PV} (probably quite
rare, but the dnsmasq recipe in meta-networking is currently one such
recipe.) All of these are now handled properly.
Additionally, drop the _get_checksums() function that wasn't being
called from anywhere in the code.
Note that this now turns nowrap_vars in recipeutils.py to be a list of
regexes, hence things such as [ and ] need to be appropriately escaped.
(From OE-Core rev: c914a5e1ad6d96e316746222e5d42f2ba9110060)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool finish will check if the destination layer is part of
bblayers.conf so that we avoid the user getting confused about the
recipe vanishing from their configuration if it isn't. devtool finish
also accepts a path underneath a layer so that you have a bit
more control over where it ends up. However if you used a path
underneath a layer then it wasn't converting this to the base of the
layer before checking it against BBLAYERS, thus the warning was being
shown erroneously in that case.
(From OE-Core rev: ab1b8d55e551fea3e8656aab7a786d1bfec62d0f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the git repository for a recipe in the workspace has uncommitted
changes in it then it's possible that the user has forgotten to commit
something, so check and exit if there are any. Provide a -f/--force
option to continue in the case where the uncommitted changes aren't
needed.
Separately, if the repository is in the middle of a rebase or git am /
apply then error out (without the opportunity to force) since the user
really needs to sort this out before finishing.
(From OE-Core rev: bfebd18982c0c82ef2da63ec8f22175c93b2e308)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then print that rather than the subdirectory path when
telling the user they need to remove the source tree, since that is the
directory that they will need to remove.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e8808099046478e98c6cf1903dc6787d69132fc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After some reconsideration I think it's a bit annoying for users to be
forced to use an option to work with recipes where the file isn't in the
workspace, so let's just have these commands check the workspace first
for the recipe, and if it isn't there then load the cache and get it
that way.
(From OE-Core rev: 46683c61069a386658676a79d797062404bf1140)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Show a warning in devtool upgrade if the version is less than the
current version suggesting that the user may need to bump PE in the
recipe
* Show a warning in devtool add and devtool upgrade if the version looks
like a pre-release version suggesting using a version number that
won't mess up the progression when you come to upgrade to the final
release version.
(From OE-Core rev: 92c4d9be9ed365c449ea1ac5a18ddb15e4a36b2d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then we weren't handling the oe-local-files directory
properly - it got extracted to the base of the tree but devtool
update-recipe and devtool finish assumed it would be under S which would
be the subdirectory, thus it would be missing and devtool would assume
the files had been deleted and remove them from the recipe. Record the
base of the source tree in the bbappend and read it into the in-memory
workspace so we can use that to find out where oe-local-files should be
found.
(From OE-Core rev: 30d2ea67b2c4727e23d06a35745b1afa64b130cc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When devtool upgrade is upgrading to a new version where the source is
fetched as an archive (e.g. a tarball), we create a single commit in the
git repository that is the upgrade from the old version to the new. We
do this by extracting the old source, committing it, deleting all files,
copying in the new files, running git add on each new/changed/deleted
file, and then committing the result. When a lot of files have changed
in an upgrade (such as QEMU 2.8.1.1 -> 2.10.0) the penultimate step of
running git add it can take quite a long time; in order to reduce this
and show some feedback to the user, run git add with batches of 100
files at once and also show a progress bar. In a local test with the
aforementioned QEMU upgrade it took the time down from over 7 minutes
down to about 13 seconds.
Fixes [YOCTO #11948].
(From OE-Core rev: 8b184f6c874b60324ee107af53853687173d3434)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With versions of git older than 2.0, "git add" on a deleted file (i.e.
in this case a file that was removed between versions) will not add the
delete to be committed by default, with the result that the rebase of
patches on top of the new branch will fail. We need to use the -A
option in order to force that for older git versions.
(From OE-Core rev: c7f4c9f050c11c0de7fcf5badcc19a8fbc6428cf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It appears that when fixing the signature unlocking in OE-Core commit
4e9a0be32fc30fb87d65da7cd1a4015c99533aff I swapped the parameters here
and did not test it within the eSDK (it does nothing outside of the
eSDK) resulting in a TypeError when devtool upgrade was used in the
eSDK. Swap the parameters around to the correct ordering.
Fixes [YOCTO #12285].
(From OE-Core rev: 05e2c4ada7083f40866846a21fe76c852f1dfefe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the source tree happens to contain a kernel module as an example, a
test or under a "contrib" directory then we shouldn't be picking it up
and making the determination that the entire thing is a kernel module.
An example that triggered this is zstd, which ships a kernel module
under contrib/linux-kernel:
https://github.com/facebook/zstd
(From OE-Core rev: c2b3154158d4bb0855daa56477393341139d4cf9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We shouldn't be passing a relative path to the plugins if that's what's
been specified on the recipetool command line.
(From OE-Core rev: 949067384c5166058ebc76f931cc492dad1db645)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add images as separate MIME objects instead of directly embedding images
in the html (as base64 encoded pngs). This makes the emails better
suited for certain email servers/clients.
(From OE-Core rev: 6b61126c386a0a7334cdf475d349b830c436ed82)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With systemd, the mounting of the swap partition is handled via systemd
and will mount it, regardless of if PARTUUID is parsed or not. systemd
has a runtime dependency on util-linux-mount so PARTUUID for regular
mount points will be handled correctly. Make all partitions that we add
to the image make use of UUIDs for maximum portability.
(From OE-Core rev: 497467262d501b94061338b4ce826c6f2f9b97b4)
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we have been told to use the UUID we should also update the fstab
to make use of PARTUUID instead of hard-coding the device in question.
This will make the resulting image much more portable.
(From OE-Core rev: e7443e7cf876d9bbe326033ac5eee0b98ce5d37f)
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use tinfoil to collect all variable names globally and in each recipe.
No longer show the count of variables if they are undocumented.
Fixes [YOCTO #2086]
(From OE-Core rev: b947de583964020b488cb1c382877624e96d4319)
Signed-off-by: Amanda Brindle <amanda.r.brindle@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The WIC's 'part' can now give a name for GPT partition in WKS file.
It's similar to '--label', but is naming partintions instead file systems.
It's required by some bootloaders to partitions have specified names.
(From OE-Core rev: 9b60e3466ed7cff0cea10815851eb1304002eb52)
Signed-off-by: Artur Mądrzak <artur@madrzak.eu>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
vm_drive variable is malformed when the drive type is an ide device.
(From OE-Core rev: 88d7b17871fe8340ab7fd5c901d3a535ae098c3e)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@tupi.fr>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With the removal of yocto-bsp and yocto-kernel there are no longer any users
of this library, therefore delete it.
(From meta-yocto rev: 0d44e59bfaa95162cf2133df1d08f6419314bb8e)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
yocto-kernel is not actively maintained and requires active feature
development to make it a useful and compelling tool.
(From meta-yocto rev: fae757e972c7df9adba4b012784c0b161e54eb82)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The bitake-layers tool in bitbake is much more featurful, widely used and
better maintained.
(From meta-yocto rev: 803f6256fde4a7d1d4ef1f365b6f10252e99674e)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The yocto-bsp tool is not actively maintained and requires active
feature development to make it a useful and compelling tool.
(From meta-yocto rev: f659eefcb0914acabe453991711b3a64a87ef9c1)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
mtools already provides a suite of msdos utilities, switch to this
one also. This could allow for future changes to reduce wic's
dependecies.
(From OE-Core rev: 13851100b81ce901069ef167d6b9b0faedb3f466)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This fixes the issue that if you don't have mtools installed on the host
thus causing host contamination, that the correct binaries would be selected
from the native sysroot.
[YOCTO #12173]
(From OE-Core rev: dca43c557449d3765fec9f8d159d5c9e4ea8b0cb)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The intent of the env setup scripts is to set BBPATH to point at the
build directory. This means if the user changes directory, bitbake can
still find the original build directory. The default bblayers.conf files
reset BBPATH to the correct components so this is safe and restores the
behaviour the script was intended to have.
[YOCTO #12163]
(From OE-Core rev: 82eeb934997c9eaa6443079dfb649a89872a222c)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If SRCREV contains a variable reference, any devtool command that
would try to update it would fail. E.g., if SRCREV = "R${PV}", then
devtool finish without having committed any changes would fail with:
oe.patch.CmdError: Command Error: 'sh -c 'git format-patch R${PV} -o
/tmp/oepatchb_doareb -- .'' exited with 0 Output:
fatal: bad revision 'R'
(From OE-Core rev: 094499c819722ad698ccb64ec65dd439b211c31c)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Some fields are multiline values which have been escaped, so add an option to
unescape the \n and \t.
(From OE-Core rev: 4165ec0057c6bbb24de681572034262351d9b34f)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Create an option to wic doesn't change fstab file, the final
fstab file will be same that in rootfs and wic doesn't update
file, e.g adding a new mount point.
Users can control the fstab file content in base-files recipe.
This is useful if you want to only create an partition but not
add fstab mount point or add new mount point using label e.g:
LABEL=recovery /recovery auto defaults 0 1
(From OE-Core rev: 00420ec42140c1b752132bda190dede85756d157)
Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\((.*), True\).
(From OE-Core rev: b848c3cb495905605283c57c79f2ed8ca17758db)
Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <liu.ming50@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It can be useful to have multiple partitions with '--source bootimg-partition'
but different content.
E.g. for TI AM335x, one boot partition can contain an first stage
bootloader ("MLO"), while the real bootloader and kernel plus devicetree
are in another one.
Patch allows to specify multiple IMAGE_BOOT_FILES with optional "_label-XXX"
or "_uuid-XXX" overrides.
E.g. with this patch, a .wks file with
| part --source bootimg-partition ... --label=mlo --active
| part --source bootimg-partition ... --label=boot0
| part --source bootimg-partition ... --label=boot1
and a recipe with
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-mlo = "\
| MLO-${MACHINE}.img;MLO \
| "
|
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-boot0 = "\
| u-boot-${MACHINE}.img;u-boot.img \
| zImage \
| "
|
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-boot1 = "${IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-boot0}"
|
| WICVARS += " \
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-mlo \
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-boot0 \
| IMAGE_BOOT_FILES_label-boot1 \
| "
is possible. It will create one partition with the MLO and two redundant
ones with the uboot + kernel.
(From OE-Core rev: 8c1dec627e9735260516fe8f0b2bfdb0ee70172b)
Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@ensc.de>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
