The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: a70103a6e400caaa87e1d36a7e59be7f3059a3bb)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Test was made building core-image-sato with package_deb on qemux86 and
qemuarm then run for two of them testimage and install packages with
apt-get using PACKAGE_FEED_URI's configuration.
Now apt support drop priviligies for install packages using a sandbox
with _apt user, the useradd class was inherit and configured to install
_apt user and group.
Rebased patches:
- 0001-Revert-always-run-dpkg-configure-a-at-the-end-of-our.patch
- 0001-fix-the-gcc-version-check.patch
- 0001-remove-Wsuggest-attribute-from-CFLAGS.patch
- disable-test.patch
- no-curl.patch
(From OE-Core rev: 369a7f7232aa8406b63376f7888896fe90f9ce40)
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
