Match the code in rust-cross-canadian so that further simplifications
can be considered in future.
(From OE-Core rev: 9fb5f81f58306b2d355049698b6a17d045bd5e1e)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5cb62d0a33777cb9afb1eea5f736a2580ce50dc7)
Signed-off-by: Jermain Horsman <jermain.horsman@nedap.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
rust-cross had special handling for armv7 targets but we also need this
for cross-canadian. Merge the code into the main function so everything is
consistent.
Also then fix the arm definition to be arm-eabi since ABI is correctly
being looked up.
(From OE-Core rev: 0adada8111c17e8e5a7c32cef86bdb8e7dfd79d3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit ff3c3dbbd2bf1bb7bb70b55cca203e9eedcf14a8)
Signed-off-by: Jermain Horsman <jermain.horsman@nedap.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
When a 'BUILD' target is requested we shouldn't be looking at TARGET_SYS but
at BUILD_SYS. Due to the way rust mangles triplets, we need the HOST_SYS triplet
to work with existing code - fixing that issue is a separate patch.
Also drop the arch_abi argument, it doens't make any sense to a getVar() call
and was a copy and paste error.
Based on a patch from Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> but separated out
and tweaked.
Fixes: bd36593ba3 ("rust-common: Drop LLVM_TARGET and simplify")
(From OE-Core rev: cccbb8358be830b83a43fe1ff8a88932dee1c228)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit d554161a045d12411f288394e253c54aa4c1257c)
Signed-off-by: Jermain Horsman <jermain.horsman@nedap.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Commit bd36593ba3db758b3eacc974e48468a665967961 did introduce a
regression when building package rust-cross-canadian-aarch64
on a x86_64 host. This commit will fix that configuration.
Suggested-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(From OE-Core rev: dc179854b7ac9e19c9fcdb45ac74c6fdeefbe289)
Signed-off-by: Peter Bergin <peter@berginkonsult.se>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit ef566af964e9f9d2c440a3b5771ed801216f30f9)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The previous changes cause sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_32_64_same_hash
to fail since RUST_XXX_SYS changes depending on the native architecture. This
is correct but these are accounted for in the layout of paths in TMPDIR so
they should be excluded from the task signatures for the correct behaviour.
(From OE-Core rev: 1887a69a1738cdf34d27f396943bce6a7e4f8e39)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2b9bb4c07d0ab53f58cbdd8a96896780a90be9a8)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This all seems over complicated for something which is basically always
one of two values. This might even help cross-canadian work on something
which isn't x86-64.
(From OE-Core rev: cf7c1cde3a3949498d0566e1ac524f8468b91380)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit bd36593ba3db758b3eacc974e48468a665967961)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
[YOCTO #14742]
The build shows below error while building for arm machines.
Exception: TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'NoneType'
Detailed error info :
Steps to reproduce:
1. Set MACHINE ?= "qemuarm" in local.conf & add 'TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK:append = " packagegroup-rust-cross-canadian-${MACHINE}"'
2. bitbake core-image-minimal -cpopulate_sdk
Complete Error:
ERROR: rust-cross-canadian-arm-1.59.0-r0 do_rust_gen_targets: Error executing a python function in exec_func_python() autogenerated:
The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was:
File: 'exec_func_python() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function: <module>
0001:
*** 0002:do_rust_gen_targets(d)
0003:
File: '/ala-lpggp31/skokkonda/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross-canadian-common.inc', lineno: 31, function: do_rust_gen_targets
0027:
0028:LLVM_TARGET[x86_64] = "${RUST_HOST_SYS}"
0029:python do_rust_gen_targets () {
0030: wd = d.getVar('WORKDIR') + '/targets/'
*** 0031: rust_gen_target(d, 'TARGET', wd, d.getVar('TARGET_LLVM_FEATURES') or "", d.getVar('TARGET_LLVM_CPU'), d.getVar('TARGET_ARCH'))
0032: rust_gen_target(d, 'HOST', wd, "", "generic", d.getVar('HOST_ARCH'))
0033: rust_gen_target(d, 'BUILD', wd, "", "generic", d.getVar('BUILD_ARCH'))
0034:}
0035:
File: '/ala-lpggp31/skokkonda/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc', lineno: 330, function: rust_gen_target
0326: # build tspec
0327: tspec = {}
0328: tspec['llvm-target'] = d.getVarFlag('LLVM_TARGET', arch_abi)
0329: tspec['data-layout'] = d.getVarFlag('DATA_LAYOUT', arch_abi)
*** 0330: tspec['max-atomic-width'] = int(d.getVarFlag('MAX_ATOMIC_WIDTH', arch_abi))
0331: tspec['target-pointer-width'] = d.getVarFlag('TARGET_POINTER_WIDTH', arch_abi)
0332: tspec['target-c-int-width'] = d.getVarFlag('TARGET_C_INT_WIDTH', arch_abi)
0333: tspec['target-endian'] = d.getVarFlag('TARGET_ENDIAN', arch_abi)
0334: tspec['arch'] = arch_to_rust_target_arch(rust_arch)
Exception: TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'NoneType'
Below are the local variables from rust_gen_target function for arm and
aarch64 targets. Refer below, the tspec varibles for 'arm' generated with NoneType.
(a) Locals at rust_gen_target for arm::
tspec['data-layout'] = None, Type of tspec['data-layout'] = <class 'NoneType'>
tspec['data-layout'] = None, Type of tspec['data-layout'] = <class 'NoneType'>
DEBUG: Python function do_rust_gen_targets finished
(b) Locals at rust_gen_target for aarch64::
tspec['data-layout'] = aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, Type of tspec['data-layout'] = <class 'str'>
tspec['max-atomic-width'] = 128, Type of tspec['max-atomic-width'] = <class 'int'>
Reason for changing arm-eabi to arm: The earlier changes introduced this bug, so reverting the change 'arm-eabi' to 'arm' fixed the issue.
(From OE-Core rev: a4886f02dfb78e861fd7afe07b4a25c262bf0421)
Signed-off-by: Sundeep KOKKONDA <sundeep.kokkonda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8ed000debb026477abd86ea3bf72adaf21d69f39)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The do_rust_gen_targets task was not rerunning when the configuration variables it
uses were changed. Add the missing variable dependencies to fix this.
[RP: Split to separate patch and add commit message]
(From OE-Core rev: 84e891d812874311b4afa20fd7d3dc4c457009f6)
Signed-off-by: Sundeep KOKKONDA <sundeep.kokkonda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 65ce2d129154d4540cb8ec960971bcf6aa5a9480)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit ef49f89c89889466ee3696ab680f8e10c961a677.
This appears to cause build failures which didn't originally show up in
testing, reverting for now.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
On modern Power systems `uname -m` yields 'ppc64le' while the toolchain
knows the architecture as 'powerpc64le'. Provide a mapping from one to
the other to integrate with the existing architecture configuration
flags.
arch_to_rust_arch() only exists to map the OE *_ARCH variables before
any further processing, unlike arch_to_rust_target_arch() which is
specific to the internal triple handling of rust.
On Linux ppc64le systems the changes give the following config:
```
$ cat ./tmp/work/ppc64le-linux/rust-native/1.58.0-r0/targets/ppc64le-linux.json
{
"llvm-target": "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu",
"data-layout": "e-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-v256:256:256-v512:512:512",
"max-atomic-width": 64,
"target-pointer-width": "64",
"target-c-int-width": "64",
"target-endian": "little",
"arch": "powerpc64",
"os": "linux",
"env": "gnu",
"vendor": "unknown",
"target-family": "unix",
"linker": "gcc",
"cpu": "generic",
"dynamic-linking": true,
"executables": true,
"linker-is-gnu": true,
"linker-flavor": "gcc",
"has-rpath": true,
"has-elf-tls": true,
"position-independent-executables": true,
"panic-strategy": "unwind"
}
```
Change-Id: Ief0c01189185d7d4da31d307270bec4e1de674ca
(From OE-Core rev: 9ab61e3cfef0157393cb870d606c2f362e190889)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The oeqa selftest test:
sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_sametune_samesigs
which checks if the sstate checksums of two identical machines
(using the same tune) are the same, apart from changes within
the machine specific stamps directory, fails on the assertion:
self.assertCountEqual(files1, files2)
due to the signature of various 32 bit package builds such as:
x86_64-linux/lib32-rust-cross-i686
x86_64-linux/rust-cross-i686
x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-libstd-rs
x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-rust
differing. Jumping down the rabbit hole past all the bitbake-diffsig
outputs that differ due to dependent hashes, you come to a diff of:
-Variable MACHINEOVERRIDES value is ${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'mx32', 'x86-x32:', '', d)}${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'm32', 'x86:', '', d)}qemuall:${MACHINE}
+Variable MACHINEOVERRIDES value is ${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'mx32', 'x86-x32:', '', d)}${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'm32', 'x86:', '', d)}qemuall:${MACHINE}:qemux86
in
stamps/x86_64-linux/rust-cross-i686/1.54.0-r0.do_rust_gen_target.<sig>
This is because there are two rust functions referencing OVERRIDES
related variables (target_is_armv7 and llvm_features_from_tune). These
indirectly influnce the build and should be excluded from the signatures
directly as is done in other toolchain recipes, e.g.:
39bfa0dd32 recipes/*-cross recipes: ignore TARGET_ARCH sstate hash
(From OE-Core rev: 72d67410e92207a98a801ddf0cb9f1297a752975)
Signed-off-by: Randy MacLeod <Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The glibc build of "rust-hello-world" throws error in libstd-rs package.
error: unrecognized arch "powerpc64le" in target specification
The same got fixed by changing the arch to "powerpc64".
(From OE-Core rev: 1a28dd447c248f6b7f0efd121160ac798e2abf0c)
Signed-off-by: Vinay Kumar <vinay.m.engg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy MacLeod <Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
