As the code stands, setting a variable with ??= could result in a ?=
variable not overriding it. This patch fixes the issue by allowing
the ast to make lookups that ignore any ??= set variables.
(Bitbake rev: 32fee2e650dfdd3aa9a7572dad1251e0c24ca34b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add an optional argument to BBCLASSEXTEND entries which gets passed to
the extention class as BBEXTENDVARIANT. Also add BBEXTENDCURR whic
is set to the current extension class name.
This mode functions slightly differently to the previous BBCLASSEXTEND
code in that PN is not changed.
(Bitbake rev: 8d3c899e0a15840c54de26d2f1fc552430517778)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This means the event handler can change variables such as PN and those
changes will be reflected in the updated variable key names.
(Bitbake rev: 664b85742d1afc94b291a85fd245abebffacdf3d)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
One of the implications is we need to register the event handlers before
executing the anonymous python functions. I can't find any issue with making
that change in any existing metadata use cases.
(Bitbake rev: a981df3cc9bf410d24f39919959952bdc6c76d03)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add skiplist to cooker that allows access to the list of packages skipped
via SkipPackage (this includes COMPATIBLE_MACHINE, INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE,
etc.) This can be used to enhance error reporting.
(From Poky rev: 6c12b7b1099c77b87d4431d55e949cf7c5f52ded)
(Bitbake rev: 7d2363f35350be27a33f568c23eb07fcd3d27e53)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allows the heavy finalise function to only be run for the case we're
interested in when running tasks, saving some processing time.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, if a variable has been set with ??= and the code looks it up
before the data finalisation phase, no value is found. This is causes
serious problems for anonymous python functions which manipulate data, or
for the fetcher revision handling code where revisions can be set with
??=.
There is also a significant performance implication for processing lazy
assignment in finalise.
Moving the check for a default value into getVarFlag addresses both
the timing issue and the performace. This change gives a 7% real time
performance improvement to parsing the Poky metadata. The cost of the
check at this point is minimal since we have all the data flags available.
This should also fix Yocto bug 752.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We will be needing this information to improve the tracebacks of python code
from the metadata, as well as to give the user information about where
variables were defined, so they know how it ended up the way it is.
(Bitbake rev: 9615c538b894f71a2d1a0ba6b3f260db91e75786)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We can use the string split method for this instead.
(Bitbake rev: aa9646717b3ee1006628246a7c495f601e62391c)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We use a custom Logger subclass for our loggers
This logger provides:
- 'debug' method which accepts a debug level
- 'plain' method which bypasses log formatting
- 'verbose' method which is more detail than info, but less than debug
(Bitbake rev: 3b2c1fe5ca56daebb24073a9dd45723d3efd2a8d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
These functions allow generation of dependency data between funcitons and
variables allowing moves to be made towards generating checksums and allowing
use of the dependency information in other parts of bitbake.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
to make updating depends easier/more intuitive/eventually faster
(Bitbake rev: f7c69462b8ba726861898817cc5b13174c78e35a)
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This way we can fully utilize bblayers, you can do everything in bblayers.conf
and avoid setting any environment variables at all.
(Bitbake rev: 5def1c8c31432968349f9b29d6333d7962260a8b)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
As an example, this displays a deprecation warning for the use of
"bb.encodeurl" when you should be using "bb.fetch.encodeurl". It includes a
convenience function for this purpose. It should be of use when moving
objects between modules permanently, changing the API the user sees.
(Bitbake rev: 78f56049ba863b2e585b89db12b32697eb879bbc)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Apparently the finalise spelling is becoming less common in British English.
(Bitbake rev: 47449b2fc433e5725839ca4f7e9bca931a475838)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
The methodpool, ${@} expansions, anonymous python functions, event handlers
now all run with the same global context, ensuring a consistent environment
for them. Added a bb.utils.better_eval function which does an eval() with the
same globals as better_exec.
(Bitbake rev: 424d7e267b009cc19b8503eadab782736d9597d0)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This implements a feature similar to BBCLASSEXTEND, but for generating
multiple versions of a given recipe. For example: BBVERSIONS = "1.0 2.0 git".
In addition to the above, one can utilize [a-b] style patterns, and can have a
:<basever> postfix, which allows you to essentially name the range of
versions. Both the current version and the basever end up in OVERRIDES, and
the basever gets placed into the BPV variable. The default BPV, if none is
specified, is the original PV of the recipe, before bbversions processing.
In this way, you can do things like:
BBVERSIONS = "1.0.[0-6]:1.0.0+
1.0.[7-9]:1.0.7+"
SRC_URI_append_1.0.7+ = "file://some_extra_patch.patch;patch=1"
Or you can create a recipe per range, and name the recipe file as such: nano_1.0.7+.bb.
(Bitbake rev: 4ee9a56e16f1eb3c1649eaa3127b09ab0e93d1ec)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
??= is a lazy, conditional assignment. Whereas a ?= immediately assigns to
the variable if the variable has not yet been set, ??= does not apply the
default assignment until the end of the parse. As a result, the final ??= for
a given variable is used, as opposed to the first as in ?=.
Note that the initial implementation relies upon finalise() to apply the
defaults, so a "bitbake -e" without specifying a recipe will not show the
defaults as set by ??=. Moving application of the default into getVar adds
too large a performance hit. We may want to revisit this later.
(Bitbake rev: 74f50fbca194c9c72bd2a540f4b9de458cb08e2d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This ensures that an anonymous python function is able to manipulate the
BBCLASSEXTEND contents, and, therefore, amend.inc files are able to add to it.
(Bitbake rev: c7d038d404afaf4ce3735af5134163759da6f6ef)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
