There was a regression in this functionality that went unnoticed
due to lack of tests.
(From OE-Core rev: a75e4eceb703b2b13ddd4ba3dea3a86af0b0a9eb)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These recipes should be excluded from target 'world' because these are
just intended to be used internally by oe-selftest (devtool, recipetool, etc.)
(From OE-Core rev: 4868bc94b8c4ebcf427ea6d321332d8b8fe6ce4a)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Use a more real-world test of a recipe pointing to a remote file
* The cleanup tracking / teardown commands need to be added towards the
top, or they won't have the desired effect of cleaning up if the test
fails.
* Check that a versioned subdirectory gets renamed to match the new
version
* Ensure the recipe contents gets changed as we expect it to
* Check that the recipe directory is deleted by devtool reset at the end
(From OE-Core rev: d0ae258e963f9bafffc4ca43c87497d27e57c127)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
