mirror of
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
synced 2026-02-06 00:38:45 +01:00
Since commit be0cabf816 on 2016/05/17, smartpm will retry the transaction if ts.run() returns with an empty list of problems, and we're in attempt mode.
But then, since all the packages are already installed, the transaction will fail with "package already installed" error.
In attempt mode, it's fine to not retry nor generate an error when the transaction fails for no reason linked to files/packages conflicts, so this patch fixes this behaviour.
(From OE-Core rev: 327f263be285525adcbbf472db6ac7722c84ac2f)
Signed-off-by: Herve Jourdain <herve.jourdain@neuf.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
186 lines
8.7 KiB
Diff
186 lines
8.7 KiB
Diff
From b105e7fe812da3ccaf7155c0fe14c8728b0d39a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:30:52 +0000
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] Add mechanism to attempt install without failing
|
|
|
|
In OpenEmbedded, for complementary and 'attemptonly' package processing,
|
|
we need a way to instruct smart to try to install, but ignore any
|
|
failures (usually conflicts).
|
|
|
|
This option only works for the install operation.
|
|
|
|
If a complementary install fails, an actual error occurred, one that
|
|
we can't ignore without losing the entire attempted transaction. Keep
|
|
this as an error so that we can catch these cases in the futre.
|
|
|
|
Upstream-Status: Pending
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
---
|
|
backends/rpm/pm.py | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
|
|
transaction.py | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
|
|
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/smart/backends/rpm/pm.py b/smart/backends/rpm/pm.py
|
|
index 9bbd952..ba6405a 100644
|
|
--- a/smart/backends/rpm/pm.py
|
|
+++ b/smart/backends/rpm/pm.py
|
|
@@ -241,15 +241,56 @@ class RPMPackageManager(PackageManager):
|
|
cb = RPMCallback(prog, upgradednames)
|
|
cb.grabOutput(True)
|
|
probs = None
|
|
+ retry = 0
|
|
try:
|
|
probs = ts.run(cb, None)
|
|
finally:
|
|
del getTS.ts
|
|
cb.grabOutput(False)
|
|
+ # If there are file conflicts, and we're attempting installation,
|
|
+ # remove conflicting packages from the transaction and retry
|
|
+ # If there are other problems returned by ts.run(), that are not
|
|
+ # linked with packages/files conflicts (the returned list is empty),
|
|
+ # then don't retry
|
|
+ if (probs is not None) and (len(probs) != 0) and sysconf.has("attempt-install", soft=True):
|
|
+ def remove_conflict(pkgNEVR):
|
|
+ for key in changeset.keys():
|
|
+ if pkgNEVR == str(key):
|
|
+ del changeset[key]
|
|
+ del pkgpaths[key]
|
|
+ iface.warning("Removing %s due to file %s conflicting with %s" % (pkgNEVR, fname, altNEVR))
|
|
+ break
|
|
+
|
|
+ retry = 1
|
|
+ for prob in probs:
|
|
+ if prob[1][0] == rpm.RPMPROB_NEW_FILE_CONFLICT:
|
|
+ msg = prob[0].split()
|
|
+ fname = msg[1]
|
|
+ pkgNEVR = msg[7]
|
|
+ altNEVR = msg[9]
|
|
+ pkgNEVR = pkgNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[0] + '@' + pkgNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[1]
|
|
+ altNEVR = altNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[0] + '@' + altNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[1]
|
|
+ remove_conflict(pkgNEVR)
|
|
+ elif prob[1][0] == rpm.RPMPROB_FILE_CONFLICT:
|
|
+ msg = prob[0].split()
|
|
+ fname = msg[1]
|
|
+ pkgNEVR = msg[5]
|
|
+ altNEVR = msg[11]
|
|
+ pkgNEVR = pkgNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[0] + '@' + pkgNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[1]
|
|
+ altNEVR = altNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[0] + '@' + altNEVR.rsplit('.', 1)[1]
|
|
+ remove_conflict(pkgNEVR)
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ retry = 0
|
|
+
|
|
prog.setDone()
|
|
- if probs is not None:
|
|
+ # If there are other problems than packages/files conflicts
|
|
+ # returned by ts.run(), the returned list is empty, and if
|
|
+ # we're only attempting installation, then don't raise any error
|
|
+ if (probs is not None) and ((len(probs) != 0) or not sysconf.has("attempt-install", soft=True)) and (not retry):
|
|
raise Error, "\n".join([x[0] for x in probs])
|
|
prog.stop()
|
|
+ if retry and len(changeset):
|
|
+ self.commit(changeset, pkgpaths)
|
|
|
|
class RPMCallback:
|
|
def __init__(self, prog, upgradednames):
|
|
diff --git a/smart/transaction.py b/smart/transaction.py
|
|
index 4b90cb7..3e043e9 100644
|
|
--- a/smart/transaction.py
|
|
+++ b/smart/transaction.py
|
|
@@ -555,6 +555,8 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
changeset.set(pkg, INSTALL)
|
|
isinst = changeset.installed
|
|
|
|
+ attempt = sysconf.has("attempt-install", soft=True)
|
|
+
|
|
# Remove packages conflicted by this one.
|
|
for cnf in pkg.conflicts:
|
|
for prv in cnf.providedby:
|
|
@@ -564,11 +566,16 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
if not isinst(prvpkg):
|
|
locked[prvpkg] = (LOCKED_CONFLICT_BY, pkg)
|
|
continue
|
|
- if prvpkg in locked:
|
|
- raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: conflicted package "
|
|
- "%s is locked") % (pkg, prvpkg)
|
|
- self._remove(prvpkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
- pending.append((PENDING_UPDOWN, prvpkg))
|
|
+ if attempt:
|
|
+ del changeset[pkg]
|
|
+ raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it conflicts with package "
|
|
+ "%s") % (pkg, prvpkg)
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ if prvpkg in locked:
|
|
+ raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: conflicted package "
|
|
+ "%s is locked") % (pkg, prvpkg)
|
|
+ self._remove(prvpkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
+ pending.append((PENDING_UPDOWN, prvpkg))
|
|
|
|
# Remove packages conflicting with this one.
|
|
for prv in pkg.provides:
|
|
@@ -579,12 +586,18 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
if not isinst(cnfpkg):
|
|
locked[cnfpkg] = (LOCKED_CONFLICT, pkg)
|
|
continue
|
|
- if cnfpkg in locked:
|
|
+ if attempt:
|
|
+ del changeset[pkg]
|
|
raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it's conflicted by "
|
|
- "the locked package %s") \
|
|
- % (pkg, cnfpkg)
|
|
- self._remove(cnfpkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
- pending.append((PENDING_UPDOWN, cnfpkg))
|
|
+ "the package %s") \
|
|
+ % (pkg, cnfpkg)
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ if cnfpkg in locked:
|
|
+ raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it's conflicted by "
|
|
+ "the locked package %s") \
|
|
+ % (pkg, cnfpkg)
|
|
+ self._remove(cnfpkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
+ pending.append((PENDING_UPDOWN, cnfpkg))
|
|
|
|
# Remove packages with the same name that can't
|
|
# coexist with this one.
|
|
@@ -594,10 +607,15 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
if not isinst(namepkg):
|
|
locked[namepkg] = (LOCKED_NO_COEXIST, pkg)
|
|
continue
|
|
- if namepkg in locked:
|
|
+ if attempt:
|
|
+ del changeset[pkg]
|
|
raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it can't coexist "
|
|
"with %s") % (pkg, namepkg)
|
|
- self._remove(namepkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ if namepkg in locked:
|
|
+ raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it can't coexist "
|
|
+ "with %s") % (pkg, namepkg)
|
|
+ self._remove(namepkg, changeset, locked, pending, depth)
|
|
|
|
# Install packages required by this one.
|
|
for req in pkg.requires + pkg.recommends:
|
|
@@ -1176,6 +1194,8 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
|
|
self._policy.runStarting()
|
|
|
|
+ attempt = sysconf.has("attempt-install", soft=True)
|
|
+
|
|
try:
|
|
changeset = self._changeset.copy()
|
|
isinst = changeset.installed
|
|
@@ -1190,7 +1210,11 @@ class Transaction(object):
|
|
locked[pkg] = (LOCKED_KEEP, None)
|
|
elif op is INSTALL:
|
|
if not isinst(pkg) and pkg in locked:
|
|
- raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it's locked") % pkg
|
|
+ if attempt:
|
|
+ iface.warning(_("Can't install %s: it's locked") % pkg)
|
|
+ del changeset[pkg]
|
|
+ else:
|
|
+ raise Failed, _("Can't install %s: it's locked") % pkg
|
|
changeset.set(pkg, INSTALL)
|
|
locked[pkg] = (LOCKED_INSTALL, None)
|
|
elif op is REMOVE:
|