Files
poky/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch
Mark Hatle fedad51cb4 binutils: Inform binutils that armv5e really is valid!
A comment in the binutils sources indicate that it should support all of the
-march= parameters that gcc supports.  The tune validations noted that
gas failed on -march=armv5e.

It is not yet clear to me if this patch belongs upstream or not.

(From OE-Core rev: 4f2503ebdb5c491b758cbdf6eb7df96d4295c24f)

Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-04-04 17:17:50 +01:00

21 lines
931 B
Diff

Add the armv5e architecture to binutils
Binutils has a comment that indicates it is supposed to match gcc for all of
the support "-march=" settings, but it was lacking the armv5e setting. This
was a simple way to add it, as thumb instructions shouldn't be generated by
the compiler anyway.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
diff -urN binutils-2.22.orig/gas/config/tc-arm.c binutils-2.22/gas/config/tc-arm.c
--- binutils-2.22.orig/gas/config/tc-arm.c 2011-11-21 03:29:31.000000000 -0600
+++ binutils-2.22/gas/config/tc-arm.c 2012-04-03 12:07:42.230158760 -0500
@@ -22990,6 +22990,7 @@
{"armv4t", ARM_ARCH_V4T, FPU_ARCH_FPA},
{"armv4txm", ARM_ARCH_V4TxM, FPU_ARCH_FPA},
{"armv5", ARM_ARCH_V5, FPU_ARCH_VFP},
+ {"armv5e", ARM_ARCH_V5TE, FPU_ARCH_VFP},
{"armv5t", ARM_ARCH_V5T, FPU_ARCH_VFP},
{"armv5txm", ARM_ARCH_V5TxM, FPU_ARCH_VFP},
{"armv5te", ARM_ARCH_V5TE, FPU_ARCH_VFP},