The change was performed as follows:
- it was checked that the COPYING.MIT license was present with the
initial commit and such each contributor was awere of the license
- mail was around to all previous contributors to check this assumption
(mail was not replied by Hannah and Sebastian); every reply was a
confirmation of the assumed MIT licensing
- all copyright information were recovered from the respective Git
commits
- reuse lint was to used to check the REUSE conformance
After recent conversion of KF5 repositories to SPDX, the outbound
licenses are much more clear. As a first step, introduce the lowest
available license version into the package. Note that many packages
are dual-licenses (e.g. LGPL-2.0-only or LGPL-2.1-only), which is
not yet respected in the statements.
Summary:
Besides dependency and file list updates, this mainly removes the implicit
assumption that the requested Git revision is in the master branch. That
is not true for frameworks with translations, as those are committed to
unnamed branches before tagging.
Reviewers: cordlandwehr
Reviewed By: cordlandwehr
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D6978
