glibc: remove bad patch snippet that eglibc forward ported

The s_sin.c patch undoes some code changes in glibc itself, these changes have nothing to
do with the option groups and I suspect crept in as part of the initial conversion.  Undoing
this patch also fixes a test failure in test-double and test-idouble.

[YOCTO #6808]

(From OE-Core rev: 5f225067dcb7244065f857d34e1041171844b243)

Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Saul Wold
2014-10-10 08:20:22 -07:00
committed by Richard Purdie
parent f8d5bfb052
commit 07de72c185

View File

@@ -15454,60 +15454,6 @@ Index: git/sysdeps/gnu/Makefile
pututxline utmpxname updwtmpx getutmpx getutmp
sysdep_headers += utmpx.h bits/utmpx.h
Index: git/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c
===================================================================
--- git.orig/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c 2014-08-29 20:00:54.260070587 -0700
+++ git/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c 2014-08-29 20:01:15.240070587 -0700
@@ -447,21 +447,19 @@
}
else
{
- double t;
if (a > 0)
{
m = 1;
- t = a;
db = da;
}
else
{
m = 0;
- t = -a;
+ a = -a;
db = -da;
}
- u.x = big + t;
- y = t - (u.x - big);
+ u.x = big + a;
+ y = a - (u.x - big);
res = do_sin (u, y, db, &cor);
cor = (cor > 0) ? 1.035 * cor + eps : 1.035 * cor - eps;
retval = ((res == res + cor) ? ((m) ? res : -res)
@@ -673,21 +671,19 @@
}
else
{
- double t;
if (a > 0)
{
m = 1;
- t = a;
db = da;
}
else
{
m = 0;
- t = -a;
+ a = -a;
db = -da;
}
- u.x = big + t;
- y = t - (u.x - big);
+ u.x = big + a;
+ y = a - (u.x - big);
res = do_sin (u, y, db, &cor);
cor = (cor > 0) ? 1.035 * cor + eps : 1.035 * cor - eps;
retval = ((res == res + cor) ? ((m) ? res : -res)
Index: git/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt/Makefile
===================================================================
--- git.orig/sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt/Makefile 2014-08-29 20:00:54.452070587 -0700