mirror of
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
synced 2026-04-20 18:32:12 +02:00
image.bbclass: Add additional bb.debug to help track 12304
We actually caught the ext4 size issue in the wild with the debug output in the oe_mkext234fs() code, but it did not help. What that showed was that the get_rootfs_size was returning a default size of 8192, where as the actual rootfs was more like 10572, thus too large to fit in the created sparse file. This additional temporary debug code should help us determine where the failure might be. More debug for [YOCTO #12304] (From OE-Core rev: 978472c58629d1448399207873bbead96b27102e) Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Richard Purdie
parent
d0de33c5d4
commit
370483fce1
@@ -534,21 +534,29 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d):
|
||||
output = subprocess.check_output(['du', '-ks',
|
||||
d.getVar('IMAGE_ROOTFS')])
|
||||
size_kb = int(output.split()[0])
|
||||
base_size = size_kb * overhead_factor
|
||||
base_size = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space
|
||||
|
||||
base_size = size_kb * overhead_factor
|
||||
bb.debug(1, '%f = %d * %f' % (base_size, size_kb, overhead_factor))
|
||||
base_size2 = max(base_size, rootfs_req_size) + rootfs_extra_space
|
||||
bb.debug(1, '%f = max(%f, %d)[%f] + %d' % (base_size2, base_size, rootfs_req_size, max(base_size, rootfs_req_size), overhead_factor))
|
||||
|
||||
base_size = base_size2
|
||||
if base_size != int(base_size):
|
||||
base_size = int(base_size + 1)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
base_size = int(base_size)
|
||||
bb.debug(1, '%f = int(%f)' % (base_size, base_size2))
|
||||
|
||||
base_size_saved = base_size
|
||||
base_size += rootfs_alignment - 1
|
||||
base_size -= base_size % rootfs_alignment
|
||||
bb.debug(1, '%d = aligned(%d)' % (base_size, base_size_saved))
|
||||
|
||||
# Do not check image size of the debugfs image. This is not supposed
|
||||
# to be deployed, etc. so it doesn't make sense to limit the size
|
||||
# of the debug.
|
||||
if (d.getVar('IMAGE_BUILDING_DEBUGFS') or "") == "true":
|
||||
bb.debug(1, 'returning debugfs size %d' % (base_size))
|
||||
return base_size
|
||||
|
||||
# Check the rootfs size against IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE (if set)
|
||||
@@ -566,6 +574,8 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d):
|
||||
(base_size, initramfs_maxsize_int))
|
||||
bb.error("You can set INITRAMFS_MAXSIZE a larger value. Usually, it should")
|
||||
bb.fatal("be less than 1/2 of ram size, or you may fail to boot it.\n")
|
||||
|
||||
bb.debug(1, 'returning %d' % (base_size))
|
||||
return base_size
|
||||
|
||||
python set_image_size () {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user