insane: Improve patch warning/error handling

Currently, whilst patch errors or warnings are shown, the errors don't stop builds.
The configuration isn't very configurable from WARN_QA and ERROR_QA either.

This patch:
 * Uses the standard mechanisms to handle the patch fuzz warnings/errors
 * Makes Upstream-Status checking configurable from WARN/ERROR_QA
 * Allows that checking to be used with non-core layers
 * Makes patch-fuzz an error by default

(From OE-Core rev: 76a685bfcf927593eac67157762a53259089ea8a)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Richard Purdie
2023-01-18 13:08:58 +00:00
parent f962c586fc
commit 3c3fd6a65e

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
WARN_QA ?= " libdir xorg-driver-abi buildpaths \
textrel incompatible-license files-invalid \
infodir build-deps src-uri-bad symlink-to-sysroot multilib \
invalid-packageconfig host-user-contaminated uppercase-pn patch-fuzz \
invalid-packageconfig host-user-contaminated uppercase-pn \
mime mime-xdg unlisted-pkg-lics unhandled-features-check \
missing-update-alternatives native-last missing-ptest \
license-exists license-no-generic license-syntax license-format \
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ ERROR_QA ?= "dev-so debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch pkgconfig la \
already-stripped installed-vs-shipped ldflags compile-host-path \
install-host-path pn-overrides unknown-configure-option \
useless-rpaths rpaths staticdev empty-dirs \
patch-fuzz patch-status-core\
"
# Add usrmerge QA check based on distro feature
ERROR_QA:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'usrmerge', ' usrmerge', '', d)}"
@@ -1334,24 +1335,27 @@ python do_qa_patch() {
msg += " devtool modify %s\n" % d.getVar('PN')
msg += " devtool finish --force-patch-refresh %s <layer_path>\n\n" % d.getVar('PN')
msg += "Don't forget to review changes done by devtool!\n"
if bb.utils.filter('ERROR_QA', 'patch-fuzz', d):
bb.error(msg)
elif bb.utils.filter('WARN_QA', 'patch-fuzz', d):
bb.warn(msg)
msg = "Patch log indicates that patches do not apply cleanly."
msg += "\nPatch log indicates that patches do not apply cleanly."
oe.qa.handle_error("patch-fuzz", msg, d)
# Check if the patch contains a correctly formatted and spelled Upstream-Status
import re
from oe import patch
allpatches = False
if bb.utils.filter('ERROR_QA', 'patch-status-noncore', d) or bb.utils.filter('WARN_QA', 'patch-status-noncore', d):
allpatches = True
coremeta_path = os.path.join(d.getVar('COREBASE'), 'meta', '')
for url in patch.src_patches(d):
(_, _, fullpath, _, _, _) = bb.fetch.decodeurl(url)
# skip patches not in oe-core
patchtype = "patch-status-core"
if not os.path.abspath(fullpath).startswith(coremeta_path):
continue
patchtype = "patch-status-noncore"
if not allpatches:
continue
kinda_status_re = re.compile(r"^.*upstream.*status.*$", re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)
strict_status_re = re.compile(r"^Upstream-Status: (Pending|Submitted|Denied|Accepted|Inappropriate|Backport|Inactive-Upstream)( .+)?$", re.MULTILINE)
@@ -1364,9 +1368,13 @@ python do_qa_patch() {
if not match_strict:
if match_kinda:
bb.error("Malformed Upstream-Status in patch\n%s\nPlease correct according to %s :\n%s" % (fullpath, guidelines, match_kinda.group(0)))
msg = "Malformed Upstream-Status in patch\n%s\nPlease correct according to %s :\n%s" % (fullpath, guidelines, match_kinda.group(0))
oe.qa.handle_error(patchtype, msg, d)
else:
bb.error("Missing Upstream-Status in patch\n%s\nPlease add according to %s ." % (fullpath, guidelines))
msg = "Missing Upstream-Status in patch\n%s\nPlease add according to %s ." % (fullpath, guidelines)
oe.qa.handle_error(patchtype, msg, d)
oe.qa.exit_if_errors(d)
}
python do_qa_configure() {