qemu: fix CVE-2020-7039

(From OE-Core rev: 5ea3d9d83ed695827634e3216664c13fcff6d48a)

(From OE-Core rev: b7b96bd938cf4167b4abeebb68d35ba74ce0d3c6)

Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Changqing Li
2020-05-02 00:41:12 +03:00
committed by Richard Purdie
parent e2065837fc
commit 76f72ee8a9
4 changed files with 170 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ SRC_URI = "https://download.qemu.org/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
file://CVE-2019-12068.patch \
file://CVE-2020-1711.patch \
file://CVE-2019-20382.patch \
file://CVE-2020-7039-1.patch \
file://CVE-2020-7039-2.patch \
file://CVE-2020-7039-3.patch \
"
UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "qemu-(?P<pver>\d+(\.\d+)+)\.tar"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
From b2663d527a1992ba98c0266458b21ada3b9d0d2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:07:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tcp_emu: Fix oob access
The main loop only checks for one available byte, while we sometimes
need two bytes.
CVE: CVE-2020-7039
Upstream-Status: Backport
[https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/commit/2655fffed7a9e765bcb4701dd876e9dab975f289]
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
---
slirp/src/tcp_subr.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
index d6dd133..4bea2d4 100644
--- a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
+++ b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
@@ -886,6 +886,8 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
break;
case 5:
+ if (bptr == m->m_data + m->m_len - 1)
+ return 1; /* We need two bytes */
/*
* The difference between versions 1.0 and
* 2.0 is here. For future versions of
@@ -901,6 +903,10 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
/* This is the field containing the port
* number that RA-player is listening to.
*/
+
+ if (bptr == m->m_data + m->m_len - 1)
+ return 1; /* We need two bytes */
+
lport = (((uint8_t *)bptr)[0] << 8) + ((uint8_t *)bptr)[1];
if (lport < 6970)
lport += 256; /* don't know why */
--
2.7.4

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
From 8f67e76e4148e37f3d8d2bcbdee7417fdedb7669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:10:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] slirp: use correct size while emulating commands
While emulating services in tcp_emu(), it uses 'mbuf' size
'm->m_size' to write commands via snprintf(3). Use M_FREEROOM(m)
size to avoid possible OOB access.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPrasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault's avatarSamuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Message-Id: <20200109094228.79764-3-ppandit@redhat.com>
CVE: CVE-2020-7039
Upstream-Status: Backport
[https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/commit/82ebe9c370a0e2970fb5695aa19aa5214a6a1c80]
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
---
slirp/src/tcp_subr.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
index 4bea2d4..e8ed4ef 100644
--- a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
+++ b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
n4 = (laddr & 0xff);
m->m_len = bptr - m->m_data; /* Adjust length */
- m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, m->m_size - m->m_len,
+ m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, M_FREEROOM(m),
"ORT %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d\r\n%s", n1, n2, n3, n4,
n5, n6, x == 7 ? buff : "");
return 1;
@@ -731,8 +731,7 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
n4 = (laddr & 0xff);
m->m_len = bptr - m->m_data; /* Adjust length */
- m->m_len +=
- snprintf(bptr, m->m_size - m->m_len,
+ m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, M_FREEROOM(m),
"27 Entering Passive Mode (%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d)\r\n%s",
n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, x == 7 ? buff : "");
@@ -758,8 +757,8 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
if (m->m_data[m->m_len - 1] == '\0' && lport != 0 &&
(so = tcp_listen(slirp, INADDR_ANY, 0, so->so_laddr.s_addr,
htons(lport), SS_FACCEPTONCE)) != NULL)
- m->m_len =
- snprintf(m->m_data, m->m_size, "%d", ntohs(so->so_fport)) + 1;
+ m->m_len = snprintf(m->m_data, M_ROOM(m),
+ "%d", ntohs(so->so_fport)) + 1;
return 1;
case EMU_IRC:
--
2.7.4

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
From 0b03959b72036afce151783720d9e54988cf76ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:15:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] slirp: use correct size while emulating IRC commands
While emulating IRC DCC commands, tcp_emu() uses 'mbuf' size
'm->m_size' to write DCC commands via snprintf(3). This may
lead to OOB write access, because 'bptr' points somewhere in
the middle of 'mbuf' buffer, not at the start. Use M_FREEROOM(m)
size to avoid OOB access.
Reported-by: default avatarVishnu Dev TJ <vishnudevtj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPrasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault's avatarSamuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Message-Id: <20200109094228.79764-2-ppandit@redhat.com>
CVE: CVE-2020-7039
Upstream-Status: Backport
[https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/commit/ce131029d6d4a405cb7d3ac6716d03e58fb4a5d9]
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
---
slirp/src/tcp_subr.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
index e8ed4ef..3a4a8ee 100644
--- a/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
+++ b/slirp/src/tcp_subr.c
@@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
return 1;
}
m->m_len = bptr - m->m_data; /* Adjust length */
- m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, m->m_size, "DCC CHAT chat %lu %u%c\n",
+ m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, M_FREEROOM(m),
+ "DCC CHAT chat %lu %u%c\n",
(unsigned long)ntohl(so->so_faddr.s_addr),
ntohs(so->so_fport), 1);
} else if (sscanf(bptr, "DCC SEND %256s %u %u %u", buff, &laddr, &lport,
@@ -787,8 +788,8 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
return 1;
}
m->m_len = bptr - m->m_data; /* Adjust length */
- m->m_len +=
- snprintf(bptr, m->m_size, "DCC SEND %s %lu %u %u%c\n", buff,
+ m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, M_FREEROOM(m),
+ "DCC SEND %s %lu %u %u%c\n", buff,
(unsigned long)ntohl(so->so_faddr.s_addr),
ntohs(so->so_fport), n1, 1);
} else if (sscanf(bptr, "DCC MOVE %256s %u %u %u", buff, &laddr, &lport,
@@ -798,8 +799,8 @@ int tcp_emu(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m)
return 1;
}
m->m_len = bptr - m->m_data; /* Adjust length */
- m->m_len +=
- snprintf(bptr, m->m_size, "DCC MOVE %s %lu %u %u%c\n", buff,
+ m->m_len += snprintf(bptr, M_FREEROOM(m),
+ "DCC MOVE %s %lu %u %u%c\n", buff,
(unsigned long)ntohl(so->so_faddr.s_addr),
ntohs(so->so_fport), n1, 1);
}
--
2.7.4