mirror of
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
synced 2026-03-17 04:39:40 +01:00
qemu: Fix CVE-2019-12068
(From OE-Core rev: 81b375ac7851088a671317468a8e2eed69d4a827) Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Richard Purdie
parent
ee9d2f4fcf
commit
8aef883936
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ SRC_URI = "https://download.qemu.org/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
|
||||
file://0009-Fix-webkitgtk-builds.patch \
|
||||
file://0010-configure-Add-pkg-config-handling-for-libgcrypt.patch \
|
||||
file://CVE-2019-15890.patch \
|
||||
file://CVE-2019-12068.patch \
|
||||
"
|
||||
UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "qemu-(?P<pver>\d+(\.\d+)+)\.tar"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
108
meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/CVE-2019-12068.patch
Normal file
108
meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/CVE-2019-12068.patch
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
From de594e47659029316bbf9391efb79da0a1a08e08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:35:21 +0530
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lsi: exit infinite loop while executing script
|
||||
(CVE-2019-12068)
|
||||
|
||||
When executing script in lsi_execute_script(), the LSI scsi adapter
|
||||
emulator advances 's->dsp' index to read next opcode. This can lead
|
||||
to an infinite loop if the next opcode is empty. Move the existing
|
||||
loop exit after 10k iterations so that it covers no-op opcodes as
|
||||
well.
|
||||
|
||||
Upstream-Status: Backport [https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=de594e47659029316bbf9391efb79da0a1a08e08]
|
||||
CVE: CVE-2019-12068
|
||||
|
||||
Reported-by: Bugs SysSec <bugs-syssec@rub.de>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
|
||||
---
|
||||
hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
|
||||
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c b/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c
|
||||
index 222a286..ec53b14 100644
|
||||
--- a/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c
|
||||
+++ b/hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c
|
||||
@@ -186,6 +186,9 @@ static const char *names[] = {
|
||||
/* Flag set if this is a tagged command. */
|
||||
#define LSI_TAG_VALID (1 << 16)
|
||||
|
||||
+/* Maximum instructions to process. */
|
||||
+#define LSI_MAX_INSN 10000
|
||||
+
|
||||
typedef struct lsi_request {
|
||||
SCSIRequest *req;
|
||||
uint32_t tag;
|
||||
@@ -1133,7 +1136,21 @@ static void lsi_execute_script(LSIState *s)
|
||||
|
||||
s->istat1 |= LSI_ISTAT1_SRUN;
|
||||
again:
|
||||
- insn_processed++;
|
||||
+ if (++insn_processed > LSI_MAX_INSN) {
|
||||
+ /* Some windows drivers make the device spin waiting for a memory
|
||||
+ location to change. If we have been executed a lot of code then
|
||||
+ assume this is the case and force an unexpected device disconnect.
|
||||
+ This is apparently sufficient to beat the drivers into submission.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ if (!(s->sien0 & LSI_SIST0_UDC)) {
|
||||
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
|
||||
+ "lsi_scsi: inf. loop with UDC masked");
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ lsi_script_scsi_interrupt(s, LSI_SIST0_UDC, 0);
|
||||
+ lsi_disconnect(s);
|
||||
+ trace_lsi_execute_script_stop();
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
insn = read_dword(s, s->dsp);
|
||||
if (!insn) {
|
||||
/* If we receive an empty opcode increment the DSP by 4 bytes
|
||||
@@ -1570,19 +1587,7 @@ again:
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
- if (insn_processed > 10000 && s->waiting == LSI_NOWAIT) {
|
||||
- /* Some windows drivers make the device spin waiting for a memory
|
||||
- location to change. If we have been executed a lot of code then
|
||||
- assume this is the case and force an unexpected device disconnect.
|
||||
- This is apparently sufficient to beat the drivers into submission.
|
||||
- */
|
||||
- if (!(s->sien0 & LSI_SIST0_UDC)) {
|
||||
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
|
||||
- "lsi_scsi: inf. loop with UDC masked");
|
||||
- }
|
||||
- lsi_script_scsi_interrupt(s, LSI_SIST0_UDC, 0);
|
||||
- lsi_disconnect(s);
|
||||
- } else if (s->istat1 & LSI_ISTAT1_SRUN && s->waiting == LSI_NOWAIT) {
|
||||
+ if (s->istat1 & LSI_ISTAT1_SRUN && s->waiting == LSI_NOWAIT) {
|
||||
if (s->dcntl & LSI_DCNTL_SSM) {
|
||||
lsi_script_dma_interrupt(s, LSI_DSTAT_SSI);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@@ -1970,6 +1975,10 @@ static void lsi_reg_writeb(LSIState *s, int offset, uint8_t val)
|
||||
case 0x2f: /* DSP[24:31] */
|
||||
s->dsp &= 0x00ffffff;
|
||||
s->dsp |= val << 24;
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * FIXME: if s->waiting != LSI_NOWAIT, this will only execute one
|
||||
+ * instruction. Is this correct?
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
if ((s->dmode & LSI_DMODE_MAN) == 0
|
||||
&& (s->istat1 & LSI_ISTAT1_SRUN) == 0)
|
||||
lsi_execute_script(s);
|
||||
@@ -1988,6 +1997,10 @@ static void lsi_reg_writeb(LSIState *s, int offset, uint8_t val)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0x3b: /* DCNTL */
|
||||
s->dcntl = val & ~(LSI_DCNTL_PFF | LSI_DCNTL_STD);
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * FIXME: if s->waiting != LSI_NOWAIT, this will only execute one
|
||||
+ * instruction. Is this correct?
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
if ((val & LSI_DCNTL_STD) && (s->istat1 & LSI_ISTAT1_SRUN) == 0)
|
||||
lsi_execute_script(s);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.7.4
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user