serf: mark patch as inappropriate for upstream submission

What the patch does is not suitable, as upstream would surely
want the issue with the code fixed, not removal of that code altogether.

I'd also note that serf is still semi-ummaintained, and the only consumer
of it is subversion, which is slowly but steadily fading away in favor of
git and artifact-specific solutions.

(From OE-Core rev: 07e14e259e5354c6465953189854229a0ea42e66)

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 634717817e94740ac8d4e8cc82cb68bfd15d8dbd)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Kanavin
2024-04-19 14:19:29 +02:00
committed by Steve Sakoman
parent 99d16e4c35
commit b4ab121b5f

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ ERROR: scons install execution failed.
and the installed paths (including the paths inside libserf*.pc)
look correct
Upstream-Status: Pending
Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [removes block of code rather than fixing the problem in that block]
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>