* I was hit by oe-selftest -r eSDK.oeSDKExtSelfTest.test_install_libraries_headers
running all tests except only this selected one:
poky $ oe-selftest -v -r eSDK.oeSDKExtSelfTest.test_install_libraries_headers -K -B /OE/build/poky/build-eSDK
2023-03-13 14:00:52,955 - oe-selftest - DEBUG - Selected tests with -r: ['eSDK.oeSDKExtSelfTest.test_install_libraries_headers']
2023-03-13 14:00:55,531 - oe-selftest - INFO - Changing cwd to /OE/build/poky/build
..
2023-03-13 14:00:58,128 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_archiver_allows_to_filter_on_recipe_name (archiver.Archiver.test_archiver_allows_to_filter_on_recipe_name)
this is caused by _built_modules_dict(modules) function
which filters out eSDK.oeSDKExtSelfTest.test_install_libraries_headers
based on the regexp and then it runs all loaded tests, because
modules are empty
the initial regexp and comment from 2017:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=80db3d999ae26d298d9d5418a32b11a4f27af9d5
# Assumption: package and module names do not contain upper case
# characters, whereas class names do
m = re.match(r'^([^A-Z]+)(?:\.([A-Z][^.]*)(?:\.([^.]+))?)?$', module)
might still be valid, but it was loosened in 2018 to accept upper case in module:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=1ecf48fd286a77078451b67879a44f9c9dc7a894
Some test cases (eSDK.oeSDK*, runtime_test/*) does not match with current regex, fix it accept all.
Then skipping the not matching modules was added later in 2018:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f2042bf3638ed4edfb167e7f7d4be6da60997ead
and regexp was updated again in 2020 not to accept upper case in modules:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=ad81ea90a815389e45ff302a85151724c71f71c3
oeqa/core/loader: refine regex to find module
test case in format <module name>.<class name>.<test case name>
this is clear when test cases is only 3 item deep.
but confused when it is 4 item deep, eg,
oelib.types.TestList.test_list_nosep
I'm afraid that changing this regexp again to accept eSDK will break
someone's favorite test case, renaming eSDK looks much safer option
There is only 1 such case in poky:
$ oe-selftest --list-modules | grep INFO.- | sed 's/^.*INFO - //g' | grep -v '^[a-z_\.]*$'
Listing all available test modules:
eSDK
Most modules are just a-z (52x), then oelib.<foo> (6x) and 7 modules with underscore '_'.
(From OE-Core rev: 173ef4397b5be19f72385b1a0d892a1fa8979d53)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Poky
Poky is an integration of various components to form a pre-packaged build system and development environment which is used as a development and validation tool by the Yocto Project. It features support for building customised embedded style device images and custom containers. There are reference demo images ranging from X11/GTK+ to Weston, commandline and more. The system supports cross-architecture application development using QEMU emulation and a standalone toolchain and SDK suitable for IDE integration.
Additional information on the specifics of hardware that Poky supports is available in README.hardware. Further hardware support can easily be added in the form of BSP layers which extend the systems capabilities in a modular way. Many layers are available and can be found through the layer index.
As an integration layer Poky consists of several upstream projects such as BitBake, OpenEmbedded-Core, Yocto documentation, the 'meta-yocto' layer which has configuration and hardware support components. These components are all part of the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded ecosystems.
The Yocto Project has extensive documentation about the system including a reference manual which can be found at https://docs.yoctoproject.org/
OpenEmbedded is the build architecture used by Poky and the Yocto project. For information about OpenEmbedded, see the OpenEmbedded website.
Contribution Guidelines
The project works using a mailing list patch submission process. Patches should be sent to the mailing list for the repository the components originate from (see below). Throughout the Yocto Project, the README files in the component in question should detail where to send patches, who the maintainers are and where bugs should be reported.
A guide to submitting patches to OpenEmbedded is available at:
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
There is good documentation on how to write/format patches at:
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Where to Send Patches
As Poky is an integration repository (built using a tool called combo-layer), patches against the various components should be sent to their respective upstreams:
OpenEmbedded-Core (files in meta/, meta-selftest/, meta-skeleton/, scripts/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/
- Mailing list: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
BitBake (files in bitbake/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/
- Mailing list: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Documentation (files in documentation/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-docs/
- Mailing list: docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
meta-yocto (files in meta-poky/, meta-yocto-bsp/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-yocto
- Mailing list: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org
If in doubt, check the openembedded-core git repository for the content you intend to modify as most files are from there unless clearly one of the above categories. Before sending, be sure the patches apply cleanly to the current git repository branch in question.