The 2.39 version of util-linux took new file descriptors based mount kernel API into use. In relation to this change, the upstream release notes in https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/blob/v2.39/Documentation/releases/v2.39-ReleaseNotes#L14-L21 mention that This change is very aggressive to libmount code, but hopefully, it does not introduce regressions in traditional mount(8) behavior. After observing following failure when booting a board using a bit older 6.1 series kernel together with initramfs rootfs based boot flow [FAILED] Failed to start Remount Root and Kernel File Systems. See 'systemctl status systemd-remount-fs.service' for details. closer inspection revealed: demoboard ~ # systemctl status -l systemd-remount-fs.service x systemd-remount-fs.service - Remount Root and Kernel File Systems Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-remount-fs.service; enabled-runtime; preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2024-08-14 14:53:48 UTC; 1min 22s ago Docs: man:systemd-remount-fs.service(8) https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/APIFileSystems Process: 76 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-remount-fs (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 76 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd-remount-fs[76]: /usr/bin/mount for / exited with exit status 32. Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd-remount-fs[81]: mount: /: mount point not mounted or bad option. Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd-remount-fs[81]: dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call. Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd[1]: systemd-remount-fs.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Aug 14 14:53:48 demoboard systemd[1]: Failed to start Remount Root and Kernel File Systems. also consequentially, 'systemctl status' reported: State: degraded When issuing 'strace -ff mount -o remount /' the failure occurred at mount_setattr(3, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, {attr_set=MOUNT_ATTR_RDONLY|MOUNT_ATTR_NOATIME|MOUNT_ATTR_NODIRATIME, attr_clr=MOUNT_ATTR_NOSUID|MOUNT_ATTR_NODEV|MOUNT_ATTR_NOEXEC|MOUNT_ATTR_NOATIME|MOUNT_ATTR_STRICTATIME|MOUNT_ATTR_NOSYMFOLLOW|0x40, propagation=0 /* MS_??? */, userns_fd=0}, 32) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) After further investigation, The issue was pinpointed to lack of Linux kernel commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=95de4ad173ca0e61034f3145d66917970961c210 ("fs: relax mount_setattr() permission checks") in the kernel version that was being used. Above mitigation was discussed in email related to then-rejected CVE-2024-26821: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024051606-imaging-entrench-b327@gregkh/T/ After testing with qemuarm64 machine different linux-yocto versions, it was observed that the issue impacts following versions of currently supported LTS kernels: - 6.6.17 (fixed since 6.6.18 i.e. mount_setattr() returns 0) - 6.1.78 (fixed since 6.1.79 i.e. mount_setattr() returns 0) - 5.15.164 which is currently the newest of 5.15.y series (i.e. no known working version) Taking the above findings into consideration, add a new PACKAGECONFIG option removing which enables users to opt-out from using the feature which can cause issues with a bit older kernels. The option is enabled only for class-target here, since it otherwise causes following error during util-linux-native's do_configure task on Debian 11 build host (mountfd_api requirement fails): | configure: error: libmount_mountfd_support selected, but required mount FDs based API not available Versions 5.10.223, 5.4.279 and 4.10.317 were also tested with qemuarm64 but the issue was not reproduced with those versions - using strace showed that the mount_setattr call associated with the new mount API problem was not issued with these LTS kernel versions, which seemed to be confirmed also by following libmount debug message in these cases: 415: libmount: HOOK: [0x7fa115e818]: failed to init new API Note: In addition to the aforementioned, this change was tested also briefly using the current latest kernel versions 6.1.104, 6.6.45 and 6.10.3 that using the old mount API with newest kernels did not introduce any observable regression to the boot flow. (From OE-Core rev: dc086d9a8613143607af3583c72ed892e20b4d66) Signed-off-by: Niko Mauno <niko.mauno@vaisala.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Poky
Poky is an integration of various components to form a pre-packaged build system and development environment which is used as a development and validation tool by the Yocto Project. It features support for building customised embedded style device images and custom containers. There are reference demo images ranging from X11/GTK+ to Weston, commandline and more. The system supports cross-architecture application development using QEMU emulation and a standalone toolchain and SDK suitable for IDE integration.
Additional information on the specifics of hardware that Poky supports is available in README.hardware. Further hardware support can easily be added in the form of BSP layers which extend the systems capabilities in a modular way. Many layers are available and can be found through the layer index.
As an integration layer Poky consists of several upstream projects such as BitBake, OpenEmbedded-Core, Yocto documentation, the 'meta-yocto' layer which has configuration and hardware support components. These components are all part of the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded ecosystems.
The Yocto Project has extensive documentation about the system including a reference manual which can be found at https://docs.yoctoproject.org/
OpenEmbedded is the build architecture used by Poky and the Yocto project. For information about OpenEmbedded, see the OpenEmbedded website.
Contribution Guidelines
Please refer to our contributor guide here: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev/contributor-guide/ for full details on how to submit changes.
Where to Send Patches
As Poky is an integration repository (built using a tool called combo-layer), patches against the various components should be sent to their respective upstreams:
OpenEmbedded-Core (files in meta/, meta-selftest/, meta-skeleton/, scripts/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/
- Mailing list: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
BitBake (files in bitbake/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/
- Mailing list: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Documentation (files in documentation/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-docs/
- Mailing list: docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
meta-yocto (files in meta-poky/, meta-yocto-bsp/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-yocto
- Mailing list: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org
If in doubt, check the openembedded-core git repository for the content you intend to modify as most files are from there unless clearly one of the above categories. Before sending, be sure the patches apply cleanly to the current git repository branch in question.