Rasmus Villemoes f163fd8ec4 package.bbclass: improve -dbg and -src package ordering
nativesdk-gpgme fails package_qa when setting PACKAGE_DEBUG_SPLIT_STYLE
= "debug-with-srcpkg".

ERROR: nativesdk-gpgme-1.10.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: non debug package contains .debug directory: nativesdk-python3-gpg path /work/x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux/nativesdk-gpgme/1.10.0-r0/packages-split/nativesdk-python3-gpg/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/gpg/.debug/_gpgme.cpython-35m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so [debug-files]

This turns out to be because the automatic moving of the -dbg package to
the beginning of the package list is disabled in that case, so the
python3-gpg packages that the recipe prepends to PACKAGES ends up before
the -dbg package.

It's not clear why the "and not split_source_package" was added when
debug-with-srcpkg was introduced. Presumably the intention was to
prevent the -dbg package to end up before the -src package, which we of
course need to. But at the same time, we still need -dbg packages to end
up before all other packages.

Using list.insert(0, ...) also means that if there happens to more than
one -dbg package, their relative ordering gets inverted in the new list.

This tries to fix these issues by sorting the packages by (priority,
original position), where priority is 10 for -src, 30 for -dbg and 50
for everything else. That guarantees that packages of the same "type"
preserve their relative ordering, while also ensuring that -dbg always
preceed other packages. This scheme is also quite extensible, and,
should the need arise, one could even expose the priorities as a knob
the recipe author could use to ensure specific orderings of packages
instead of the somewhat fragile and coarse-grained method of "prepend or
append, and ensure you do that in a proper order".

Probably the autodebug condition needs to stay, but I think the
split_source_package condition in the preceding elif should be removed,
so that that logic applies to all packages called -src, not just the one
we might have created a few lines above.

(From OE-Core rev: 805edbc7dc9ceae00d991f9b4e185bbbe1d3ba45)

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-08-15 21:45:58 +01:00
2014-01-02 12:58:54 +00:00
2018-02-24 10:31:45 +00:00

QEMU Emulation Targets
======================

To simplify development, the build system supports building images to
work with the QEMU emulator in system emulation mode. Several architectures
are currently supported in 32 and 64 bit variants:

  * ARM (qemuarm + qemuarm64)
  * x86 (qemux86 + qemux86-64)
  * PowerPC (qemuppc only)
  * MIPS (qemumips + qemumips64)

Use of the QEMU images is covered in the Yocto Project Reference Manual.
The appropriate MACHINE variable value corresponding to the target is given
in brackets.
Description
No description provided
Readme 252 MiB